FBI says, it has ?No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11?

By | June 19, 2006

FBI says it has No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 911

“Surprised by the ease in which this FBI spokesman made such an astonishing statement, I asked, ?How this was possible?? Tomb continued, ?Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11.? I asked, ?How does that work?? Tomb continued, ?The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice than decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, Bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connected Bin Laden to 9/11.?

It shouldn?t take long before the full meaning of these FBI statements start to prick your brain and raise your blood pressure. If you think the way I think, in quick order you will be wrestling with a barrage of very powerful questions that must be answered. First and foremost, if the U.S. government does not have enough hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11, how is it possible that it had enough evidence to invade Afghanistan to ?smoke him out of his cave?? The federal government claims to have invaded Afghanistan to ?root out? Bin Laden and the Taliban. Through the talking heads in the mainstream media, the Bush Administration told the American people that Usama Bin Laden was Public Enemy Number One and responsible for the deaths of nearly 3000 people on September 11, 2001. Yet nearly five years later, the FBI says that it has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11. ” – infoc

Leave a Reply